The Art and Science of Business Valuation: A Practical Guide for Financial Professionals

---

The Art and Science of Business Valuation: A Practical Guide for Financial Professionals

• 21 October 2025
• Negotiating Tax Debt and Payment Arrangements with SARS
• South African Accounting Academy

Business valuation is one of those areas in finance where precision meets persuasion, and objectivity dances with judgment. It's not just about crunching numbers; it's about understanding the very psychology of business, the motives behind transactions, and the complex interplay between what something is worth and what someone is willing to pay for it.

As one experienced practitioner puts it: "This is probably one of my favorite topics to work with. I think it is one of those areas in our world, being finance world, where art meets science. It's a bit of a craft to do valuations."

Understanding the Nature of Business Valuation

The first thing to grasp about business valuations is that they're not exact sciences. Unlike balancing a set of books or calculating depreciation, valuations involve reasoned consideration rather than absolute precision. This can be uncomfortable for those who prefer definitive answers, but it's the reality of the field.

A proper valuation estimates the price that prospective buyers and sellers would negotiate for a company. There's always a range of right answers, and there's always going to be some bias depending on your perspective. Are you representing the buyer who wants to pay as little as possible? Or the seller who wants to maximize their return?

The ultimate "correct" value of a business is actually determined at the boardroom table, at the price where a willing buyer and willing seller meet. A successful negotiation typically ends with both parties walking away slightly unhappy, having each given a little and taken a little.

Why Businesses Need Valuations

There are numerous circumstances that call for a formal business valuation.

Mergers and acquisitions form a significant portion of valuation work. When buying or selling a business, valuations provide the starting point for negotiations. Buyers naturally want lower valuations, while sellers aim higher.

Tax and estate planning has become increasingly important, particularly with SARS scrutinizing connected-person transactions more closely. When family members transfer shares or businesses change hands between related parties, fair market valuations are essential to satisfy tax authorities. SARS has become particularly vigilant about pushing back on net asset value calculations for service-based businesses where this method isn't appropriate.

Businesses seeking investment or finance need to demonstrate their worth to potential investors and lenders. Your credit rating and access to finance may even be linked to sustainability considerations these days.

For family-run or small businesses, incorporating an annual valuation provision in shareholder agreements creates a regular "pulse check" on company performance. It's like going for your annual medical, giving you a snapshot of where the business stands based on current performance.

Changes in accounting frameworks like IFRS for SMEs (moving to a fair value framework in the third edition) mean valuations are increasingly necessary for financial reporting purposes, including impairment testing and fair valuing of investments.

The Fundamental Formula: Benefit vs. Risk

Every valuation model, regardless of complexity, boils down to a simple relationship: value equals benefit divided by risk.

The benefit is relatively straightforward to determine. It's the cash flows, earnings, or dividends the investment will generate. The challenge lies in assessing the risk.

Risk is defined as the difference between expected and actual outcomes. A high-risk investment means there's a significant gap between what you forecast and what might actually happen. A low-risk investment means your predictions are more reliable, and the actual results will likely be close to expectations.

This creates an inverse relationship. Higher risk requires a higher return, which results in a lower valuation. Lower risk allows for a lower required return, which produces a higher valuation.

Consider a simple example: If an investment generates R10,000 per year in perpetuity, what would you pay for it? At a 10% discount rate (neutral risk), you'd pay R100,000. But if you see it as riskier and require a 12.5% return, you'd only pay R80,000. Conversely, if you see it as safer and are comfortable with an 8% return, you'd pay R125,000.

As interest rates rise, asset values fall. This is why understanding and quantifying risk is where most of the judgment, and most of the debate, occurs in valuations.

The Three Main Valuation Approaches

Professional valuators never rely on a single calculation. You should always use a minimum of two different models to provide a reasonable range and cross-check your findings.

1. Net Asset Value (NAV)

The Net Asset Value approach is the most basic method, calculating the company's worth as the sum of its parts: fair market value of assets minus liabilities.

This method works best for capital-intensive businesses where real value sits on the balance sheet. Construction companies, property holding companies, and liquidation scenarios are typical applications. It also serves as a useful reasonableness check for other valuation methods.

The process involves going through the balance sheet line by line, determining the market value of each asset and liability. What could you actually sell the motor vehicles for? What's the realistic recovery value of debtors? What's the market value of the debt?

The biggest limitation is that NAV doesn't capture inherent goodwill. It misses the intangible value created when all the parts work together: customer relationships, brand value, and operational synergies. It also doesn't account for internally generated intangible assets that couldn't be capitalized under accounting rules, like customer lists or developed software.

NAV typically produces the lowest valuation figure, which is why SARS often challenges it as the sole valuation method for service businesses where the value doesn't reside primarily in tangible assets.

2. Discounted Cash Flow (DCF)

The DCF model is highly regarded because it focuses on cash, and cash is king. This method projects the company's future free cash flows over a period (typically 3 to 5 years) and discounts them back to present value using an appropriate discount rate.

The process starts with forecasting normalized operational cash flows. You then add back after-tax interest (to avoid double counting when using WACC) and apply the weighted average cost of capital as the discount rate. Finally, you present value all future cash flows back to today.

DCF is more objective than earnings-based models. The judgment areas are fewer and more defensible. Cash is harder to manipulate than earnings, making this method stand up well to scrutiny. If you're facing interrogation of your valuation, DCF provides the strongest defense.

The main challenge is that you need reliable cash flow projections. Going beyond 3 to 5 years becomes unrealistic. How can you truly predict cash flows a decade out? For periods beyond your detailed forecast, you might treat the business as a perpetuity from that point forward.

3. Capitalized Earnings (Maintainable Earnings)

This is perhaps the most common method for small to medium-sized businesses. You determine a single figure representing the business's expected annual maintainable earnings, then multiply it by a factor to arrive at the business value.

The first step involves normalizing earnings. Take the income statements from the past 3 to 5 years and strip out non-recurring items (that unusual insurance claim, the one-off project), owner-specific expenses (director's holidays, the housekeeper's salary running through the books), and items that will change under new ownership (no salary for key management because the owner just takes drawings).

You'll need to add in expenses that will start occurring: market-rate salary for a general manager, commercial rates for logistics instead of using the brother-in-law's company.

The second step requires weighting the years appropriately. If profits are on an upward trajectory, your most recent year carries more weight. On a downward trend, you might use just the most recent year. With volatile results, use a weighted average, giving more weight to recent years but not ignoring the pattern.

The third step, applying the multiplier, is where art overtakes science. The multiplier (or P/E ratio) reflects the risk assessment.

For small to medium-sized businesses, common multipliers range from 2 to 3. A low-risk, stable business might command a multiplier of 5 (the highest typically accepted is about 5, and that's for an absolute cash cow business). The multiplier answers the question: "How many years would it take for the business to pay back my investment through its maintainable earnings?"

Determining the multiplier requires deep analysis of the industry and competitive landscape, economic outlook, company-specific risks (key person dependency, customer concentration), financial health (liquidity, gearing), transferability of shares and ease of exit, and sustainability and ESG considerations (increasingly important for credit ratings and investor appeal).

You might look at P/E ratios of listed companies in the same industry as a starting point, then adjust for your company's specific circumstances. A small private company will have higher risk than a listed counterpart because shares aren't liquid, there's typically key person risk, and scale provides less resilience.

Calculating Cost of Capital

For debt, determining the cost is relatively straightforward. Look at current market rates (prime rate, bank lending rates) and adjust for the company's credit risk profile. A strong borrower might get prime minus 0.5%, while a riskier venture might pay prime plus 2%.

For equity, it's more complex. The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) provides a framework:

Cost of Equity = Risk-free rate + Beta × (Market return - Risk-free rate)

The risk-free rate comes from South African government bonds. Market return could be considered from rates like prime. Beta is a measure of the company's risk relative to the market.

For listed companies, betas are published and readily available. For private companies, you might look at betas of similar listed companies and adjust for your company's specific risk profile, though this is admittedly not ideal and adds another layer of judgment.

The Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) blends the cost of equity and cost of debt, weighted by their proportion in the capital structure. WACC represents what it would cost the company to raise capital today, not what historic rates were, but what shareholders and lenders would require now for their investment.

Putting Together the Valuation Report

A professional valuation isn't just a number. It's a comprehensive document that shows your workings and justifies your conclusions. Transparency is crucial. Anyone reading your report should be able to follow your logic and assess whether they agree.

A structured valuation report typically includes several key sections. Start with the scope and purpose: who requested the valuation, for what purpose, and any limitations on its use. The executive summary should present the key findings upfront, stating what the business is worth and based on what primary methodology.

The company overview covers ownership structure, management and governance, products, services, and markets, plus competitive position. Industry and economic analysis examines industry trends and outlook, competitive landscape, regulatory environment, and economic factors.

Include a SWOT analysis covering strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats specific to this business. The financial analysis section presents historical financial performance, normalization adjustments made and why, plus key financial ratios and trends.

The valuation methodology section explains which models were chosen and why they're appropriate, provides detailed calculations for each model, and explicitly states all assumptions (especially growth rates, discount rates, and risk factors).

Reconciliation and conclusion compare how the different models stack up, present the final value or value range, and include sensitivity analysis (what happens if revenue is 5% lower? If costs rise 10%?).

Don't forget limitations and qualifications: what you couldn't assess, information not available, and any caveats. Finally, appendices should contain supporting calculations, detailed financial statements, and industry research.

Critical Considerations and Common Pitfalls

The past few years have made historical analysis challenging. When a year is clearly abnormal (like a COVID year), it's often appropriate to exclude it entirely from your averaging calculations.

Be vigilant about maintaining objectivity. Your client might want you to produce a specific number (high for a sale, low for tax purposes), but your professional duty is to provide an honest, defensible valuation. Having difficult conversations about reality versus expectations is part of the job.

SARS has become increasingly sophisticated in reviewing valuations, particularly for connected-person transactions. They're looking for logic and consistency. If the same shares are sold to a family member for R500,000 at noon and to a third party for R5 million at 2 PM, expect serious questions.

In the current environment, you need to show your workings like you're writing an exam paper. Every decision, every adjustment, every assumption should be documented and justified. Your report should withstand scrutiny not just from your client, but potentially from SARS, investors, or opposing counsel.

There's a premium for control when buying a majority stake. You gain the power to influence strategy, operations, and distributions, which is worth more than a passive minority position. Conversely, selling down from majority to minority means giving up more than just the share certificates; you're relinquishing control.

In a net asset value calculation, clarity is essential about the deal structure. Is the buyer taking on the debt, or will you settle it first? Are debtors and cash coming with the business, or staying with you? What about working capital? The date of transfer and what crosses at that point can be contentious, so spell it out clearly in sale agreements.

The Reality of Valuation Work

At the end of the day, if you had ten valuators in a room looking at the same business, you'd get ten different answers. They'd hopefully all fall within a range of each other, but they wouldn't be identical. That's not a flaw in the system; it's the nature of valuation work.

Some businesses will be easier to value than others. A franchise with established valuation methods set by head office removes much of the guesswork. A stable, mature business with consistent earnings and minimal owner dependency is more straightforward than a startup or a business heavily dependent on a single customer or key person.

The key is to be thorough in your research, transparent in your assumptions, logical in your reasoning, and honest about limitations. A well-constructed valuation report isn't about getting to the "right" number. It's about getting to a defensible position that can withstand scrutiny and provides a solid basis for negotiation.

Whether you're valuing a business for a potential sale, for tax purposes, for shareholder agreements, or simply as an annual health check, remember that this is as much about understanding the business deeply as it is about the mathematics. The numbers tell a story, but you need to understand the full narrative: the industry, the economy, the people, and the prospects to truly assess what a business is worth.

---

Looking to develop your skills in business valuation? Our comprehensive webinar on "Conducting Business Valuations" provides practical guidance on valuation methodologies, worked examples, and template reports to help you confidently approach this complex but essential area of financial practice.

0 COMMENTS

LEAVE A COMMENT